BETA
This is a BETA experience. You may opt-out by clicking here

Breaking

Edit Story

Senate GOP Blocks Bump Stock Ban—After Supreme Court Tosses Trump-Era Policy

Updated Jun 20, 2024, 11:24am EDT

Topline

Senate Republicans blocked legislation Tuesday that would have restored a ban on bump stocks struck down by the Supreme Court last week, rejecting a policy initially backed by the Trump administration to ban devices that cause semiautomatic guns to fire rapidly.

Key Facts

The bill was rejected under a procedure requiring unanimous consent: Sen. Martin Heinrich, D-N.M., asked for the Senate’s consent to pass the bill, but at least one Republican, Sen. Pete Ricketts, R-Neb., objected, so the bill was blocked.

Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., made clear earlier Tuesday that GOP senators would block the bill from moving forward, despite some bipartisan support as one Republican, Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, co-sponsored the bill.

Republicans who oppose the ban suggested it’s a matter that shouldn’t be subject to federal legislation: Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla. called it a “states issue” and Sen. J.D. Vance, R-Ohio, questioned whether Congress should be “legislating in a way that solves fake problems?”

Proponents of the ban have argued the devices essentially allow semiautomatic firearms to function as machine guns by repeatedly “bumping” a shooter’s finger against the trigger at high speed.

The Supreme Court, however, disagreed, arguing that firearms equipped with the devices don’t meet the legal definition of a machine gun, which can fire multiple shots with “a single function of the trigger,” so Trump-era executive branch officials didn’t have the authority to ban the devices under the laws passed by Congress.

Get Forbes Breaking News Text Alerts: We’re launching text message alerts so you'll always know the biggest stories shaping the day’s headlines. Text “Alerts” to (201) 335-0739 or sign up here.

Crucial Quote

"There's no law enforcement application for a bump stock. There's no military application for a bump stock. There's no self-defense application for a bump stock. These things are, like, tailor-made for mass shootings," Heinrich said Tuesday on the Senate floor.

Surprising Fact

The Trump campaign told the Associated Press the Supreme Court’s decision “should be respected” and emphasized Trump’s support for Second Amendment rights in response to the ruling last week.

Tangent

Republicans’ reversal on the bump stock ban comes after the National Rifle Association also walked back its previous opposition to the devices, and filed a brief with the Supreme Court in favor of lifting the restrictions.

Key Background

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives enacted the ban in 2018 after a bump stock was used by the gunman in the 2017 mass shooting at a Las Vegas music festival to fire more than 1,000 bullets in 11 minutes, killing 60 people and injuring more than 850 in the deadliest mass shooting in U.S. history. The Supreme Court sided with a Texas gun shop owner, Michael Cargill, who argued the ATF acted outside of the scope of its authority in banning the devices, ruling 6-3 to lift the ban, with the three liberal justices dissenting.

Further Reading

Republicans Poised To Kill Bump Stock Ban—Even After Many Once Supported Restrictions (Forbes)

Bump Stocks: What To Know About Controversy Over Gun Devices As Supreme Court Drops Ban (Forbes)

Bump Stocks Now Legal Again As Supreme Court Strikes Down Trump-Era Gun Device Ban(Forbes)

Join The Conversation

Comments 

One Community. Many Voices. Create a free account to share your thoughts. 

Read our community guidelines .

Forbes Community Guidelines

Our community is about connecting people through open and thoughtful conversations. We want our readers to share their views and exchange ideas and facts in a safe space.

In order to do so, please follow the posting rules in our site's Terms of Service.  We've summarized some of those key rules below. Simply put, keep it civil.

Your post will be rejected if we notice that it seems to contain:

  • False or intentionally out-of-context or misleading information
  • Spam
  • Insults, profanity, incoherent, obscene or inflammatory language or threats of any kind
  • Attacks on the identity of other commenters or the article's author
  • Content that otherwise violates our site's terms.

User accounts will be blocked if we notice or believe that users are engaged in:

  • Continuous attempts to re-post comments that have been previously moderated/rejected
  • Racist, sexist, homophobic or other discriminatory comments
  • Attempts or tactics that put the site security at risk
  • Actions that otherwise violate our site's terms.

So, how can you be a power user?

  • Stay on topic and share your insights
  • Feel free to be clear and thoughtful to get your point across
  • ‘Like’ or ‘Dislike’ to show your point of view.
  • Protect your community.
  • Use the report tool to alert us when someone breaks the rules.

Thanks for reading our community guidelines. Please read the full list of posting rules found in our site's Terms of Service.