BETA
This is a BETA experience. You may opt-out by clicking here

Breaking

Edit Story

Meta Must Face Lawsuit Claiming It Prefers Hiring Foreign Workers, Appeals Court Rules

Following
Updated Jun 28, 2024, 12:33pm EDT

Topline

Meta must face a proposed class-action lawsuit alleging it prefers hiring foreign workers over U.S. citizens, a California-based federal appeals court ruled Thursday, after the lawsuit was originally thrown out in late 2022.

Key Facts

The lawsuit alleges Meta violated Section 1981, a law prohibiting discrimination in contracts, by allegedly discriminating against U.S. citizens in its hiring.

The judges in a 2-1 decision ruled that while citizenship discrimination differs from racial discrimination, which is the basis of Section 1981, it is not different in regard to its relevance to the text of the law itself, according to court filings.

The lawsuit was brought by software engineer Purushothaman Rajaram, who alleges that Meta refused to hire him because it allegedly “prefers to hire noncitizens holding H-1B visas to whom it can pay lower wages,” court filings show.

Meta, the parent company of Facebook, Instagram, Threads and WhatsApp, has previously denied wrongdoing, according to Reuters.

Daniel Low of Kotchen Low, the firm representing Rajaram, told Forbes in a statement involved parties are “pleased that the Ninth Circuit agreed with our interpretation of Section 1981,” adding that: “Citizenship discrimination against U.S. citizens has become a significant problem in recent years with a number of tech companies improperly favoring H-1B visa workers over U.S. citizens.”

Representatives for Meta and did not immediately respond to Forbes’ request for comment.

Chief Critic

Judge Lawrence VanDyke dissented in Thursday’s ruling. He wrote that the case is not easy to interpret, but he personally liked the majority’s conclusion better than his own. “A statute that protects against this sort of discrimination may be what this country needs, but it isn’t what Congress gave us in Section 1981,” he wrote. “And it’s not my role to transform this statute into what I wish it was. I therefore reluctantly dissent.”

Key Background

Rajaram unsuccessfully applied to Meta on several occasions between 2020 and 2022, according to court filings. He filed the complaint against the company in May 2022, and is seeking class-action status, according to Reuters. The lawsuit was thrown out by a federal judge in November 2022, but he appealed the decision last May and the appeals court heard oral arguments on the case in October.

Tangent

In mid-May, independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and American Values 2024, the super PAC backing his candidacy, filed a lawsuit against Meta, alleging it violated the First Amendment by blocking a campaign ad on Instagram and Facebook.

Further Reading

Meta must face lawsuit claiming it prefers foreign workers over US citizens (Reuters)

Facebook Beats Lawsuit Charging Bias Against Hiring US Citizens (Bloomberg Law News)

Meta Case Tests Limits on Citizenship Bias Claims at Ninth Cir. (Bloomberg Law News)

RFK Jr. Sues Meta For Blocking Campaign Ad (Forbes)

Send me a secure tip

Join The Conversation

Comments 

One Community. Many Voices. Create a free account to share your thoughts. 

Read our community guidelines .

Forbes Community Guidelines

Our community is about connecting people through open and thoughtful conversations. We want our readers to share their views and exchange ideas and facts in a safe space.

In order to do so, please follow the posting rules in our site's Terms of Service.  We've summarized some of those key rules below. Simply put, keep it civil.

Your post will be rejected if we notice that it seems to contain:

  • False or intentionally out-of-context or misleading information
  • Spam
  • Insults, profanity, incoherent, obscene or inflammatory language or threats of any kind
  • Attacks on the identity of other commenters or the article's author
  • Content that otherwise violates our site's terms.

User accounts will be blocked if we notice or believe that users are engaged in:

  • Continuous attempts to re-post comments that have been previously moderated/rejected
  • Racist, sexist, homophobic or other discriminatory comments
  • Attempts or tactics that put the site security at risk
  • Actions that otherwise violate our site's terms.

So, how can you be a power user?

  • Stay on topic and share your insights
  • Feel free to be clear and thoughtful to get your point across
  • ‘Like’ or ‘Dislike’ to show your point of view.
  • Protect your community.
  • Use the report tool to alert us when someone breaks the rules.

Thanks for reading our community guidelines. Please read the full list of posting rules found in our site's Terms of Service.