BETA
This is a BETA experience. You may opt-out by clicking here

Breaking

Edit Story

Voter Fraud Believer—Indicted For Election Tampering—Loses GOP Nomination For Colorado Secretary Of State

Following
Updated Jun 28, 2022, 10:01pm EDT

Topline

Former county clerk Pam Anderson has won the Republican nomination for Colorado secretary of state, the Associated Press projected Tuesday night, easily defeating Tina Peters, a county election official who has spread unproven voter fraud claims and was indicted earlier this year for allegedly tampering with local voting machines.

Key Facts

The AP called Tuesday’s primary race for Anderson—who previously served as clerk of Colorado’s Jefferson County—at 9:40 p.m. Eastern.

With more than 90% of total votes counted late Tuesday evening, Anderson led at 43.5%, well ahead of nonprofit leader Mike O’Donnell (28.9%) and Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters (27.5%).

Peters had set herself apart by repeatedly insisting—despite ample evidence to the contrary—the 2020 election was rigged, telling the Colorado Sun this month she thinks the election was stolen based on “the evidence that I have seen and gone through.”

Meanwhile, Anderson told the Sun she believes the 2020 presidential race was fair and accurate, and denounced “mis- and dis-information about the election” in an interview with Axios.

But prosecutors say Peters went further than merely claiming the 2020 election was stolen: In March, a local grand jury indicted Peters on 10 counts, accusing Peters and her deputy of planning a “deceptive scheme” to let an unauthorized person take images of sensitive county election equipment while looking into fraud claims last year.

Images and passwords from Mesa County voting systems surfaced on right-wing sites last August, after the breach, which Secretary of State Jena Griswold (D) blamed on Peters.

Contra

Peters has called the charges against her politically motivated, and told the Sun “I will never plead guilty because I’ve committed no crime.” In an interview with a Denver TV station last year, Peter said she “did a back-up image” of election systems ahead of a software update because she was “concerned that they were going to delete some important election files.”

Surprising Fact

Last month, a judge prohibited Peters from overseeing this year’s primary and general election in Mesa County due to the charges against her. The same judge also barred Peters from supervising last November’s election as a result of the allegations, finding Peters and her deputy—neither of whom had been criminally charged yet—”neglected their duties.”

What To Watch For

Anderson will face off in a November general election against Griswold, who ran unopposed for the Democratic nomination. Polling in the election is limited, but Griswold defeated Republican incumbent Wayne Williams by a 5.8-point margin in 2018.

Key Background

Republicans in multiple states have pushed unsubstantiated voter fraud allegations over the last 18 months in support of former President Donald Trump’s false insistence his 2020 election loss was due to widespread voter fraud. This year, baseless fraud claims have seeped into political campaigns: Prominent voter fraud believers are also running in secretary of state races in Arizona, Nevada and Michigan. In some cases, local officials have also sought to investigate unfounded fraud allegations on their own. Some GOP lawmakers in Arizona commissioned a bizarre and controversial audit of 2020 election results in Maricopa County last year, Pennsylvania Republicans pushed for a similar audit, and a more routine election review in a small New Hampshire town was seized upon by Trump supporters who believed it would surface proof of vote-rigging. Meanwhile, elected officials in a rural New Mexico county briefly refused to certify primary election results this month due to vague suspicions about voting machines, before finally certifying the race following a court order.

Further Reading

The Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters’ election security controversy, explained (Colorado Public Radio)

Follow me on TwitterSend me a secure tip

Join The Conversation

Comments 

One Community. Many Voices. Create a free account to share your thoughts. 

Read our community guidelines .

Forbes Community Guidelines

Our community is about connecting people through open and thoughtful conversations. We want our readers to share their views and exchange ideas and facts in a safe space.

In order to do so, please follow the posting rules in our site's Terms of Service.  We've summarized some of those key rules below. Simply put, keep it civil.

Your post will be rejected if we notice that it seems to contain:

  • False or intentionally out-of-context or misleading information
  • Spam
  • Insults, profanity, incoherent, obscene or inflammatory language or threats of any kind
  • Attacks on the identity of other commenters or the article's author
  • Content that otherwise violates our site's terms.

User accounts will be blocked if we notice or believe that users are engaged in:

  • Continuous attempts to re-post comments that have been previously moderated/rejected
  • Racist, sexist, homophobic or other discriminatory comments
  • Attempts or tactics that put the site security at risk
  • Actions that otherwise violate our site's terms.

So, how can you be a power user?

  • Stay on topic and share your insights
  • Feel free to be clear and thoughtful to get your point across
  • ‘Like’ or ‘Dislike’ to show your point of view.
  • Protect your community.
  • Use the report tool to alert us when someone breaks the rules.

Thanks for reading our community guidelines. Please read the full list of posting rules found in our site's Terms of Service.